Monday, October 06, 2008

+1

to Kim's suggestion.

If it were anybody other than Kim making the proposal, you'd hear me pondering the take-off velocity of aerodynamically contoured porkers. As is, who knows?

It was pointed out to me earlier today that SAML's own Security Services TC might be considered guilty of the same over-reaching.

In the same spirit of fairness, I propose that we change its name to the 'Security (not to say that there aren't other equally valid mechanisms) Services TC.

No comments: