tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post7885093064476333400..comments2024-02-13T08:56:52.521-05:00Comments on ConnectID: Clash of the TitansPaul Madsenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08489111023182783403noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post-22636963018808806462007-06-26T07:42:00.000-04:002007-06-26T07:42:00.000-04:00Kim, indeed eh, but your very next sentence descri...Kim, indeed eh, but your very next sentence describes IDP/RP collusion. Perhaps I inappropriately correlated the two sentences? :-)Paul Madsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08489111023182783403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post-40439829004903001572007-06-26T01:52:00.000-04:002007-06-26T01:52:00.000-04:00I think your "is not a case of collusion" and my "...I think your "is not a case of collusion" and my "without the requirement for any collusion" are pretty much the same thing, "eh?"...<BR/><BR/>And so on and so onAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com