tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post2862696309833797100..comments2024-02-13T08:56:52.521-05:00Comments on ConnectID: The calculusPaul Madsenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08489111023182783403noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post-5071732340573070722010-06-14T07:41:01.098-04:002010-06-14T07:41:01.098-04:00Thanks for the comment. I'm saying only that t...Thanks for the comment. I'm saying only that the value of a trust framework for a Relying Party is to increase the size of the population of candidate IdPs from which the RP can choose. <br /><br />(Similarly for the IdP, ie getting certified means that the population of RPs that might accept its assertions/claims is increased.)<br /><br />But little/no value in a trust framework for RPs thatPaul Madsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08489111023182783403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12447072.post-14982727399119022612010-06-12T13:09:42.160-04:002010-06-12T13:09:42.160-04:00If there was a thesis to write on that, I probably...If there was a thesis to write on that, I probably should be the guy looking over it, so let me get you idea straight: what you are saying is that using a framework is beneficial for both the identity provider and the resource user? Therefore everybody should be using frameworks? Sounds a bit tautological to me —don't worry: it won't make you any different from a majority of papers in Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com